Mapping 10 Years of China’s Progress
Although we face many difficulties in the world today, there should be little doubt that China will weather the storm and keep moving forwards.
Although we face many difficulties in the world today, there should be little doubt that China will weather the storm and keep moving forwards.
The last 10 years prove that, despite the yearly predictions of imminent economic or political collapse and the best efforts of those who fear China’s rise, China has a resilient and focused system that won’t be easily derailed.
China’s people-centered development philosophy not only improves livelihoods but also brings social stability, thus offering a favorable setting that allows a society to achieve quick economic progress and prosperity.
It is questionable whether the new King Charles III can reverse what has been a long but small decline in the popularity of the monarchy.
China has already come a long way in preserving its cultural – both tangible and intangible – heritage in recent years. The country has proven its mettle in transforming cultural heritage into an effective tool for socio-economic development.
If the American government and a large portion of the public think they should do nothing about health and safety until there is a crisis, then there are going to be more crises.
China’s transportation system has changed dramatically in the last 10 years. The nation finishes the decade with the world’s largest HSR network, longest highway network, most shared bikes, longest metro system and most extensive stock of NEVs.
If the European Union wishes to become more resilient, it ought to rethink its economic policies, reassert its strategic autonomy as opposed to being subdued by the actions of third-party countries, and focus on attaining prosperity than the pursuit of other countries’ hegemonic goals and ideological crusades.
Debt is the symptom of an exploitative educational system, not the cause. The Biden administration should try to decrease the price of tuition.
There’ll be a massive undertaking, but given the success of the enormous poverty alleviation campaign, the prospects look good.
The so-called U.S. ‘commitment’ to Asia is superficial, self-interested and short-sighted. The IPEF risks imposing costs on its members but offers no benefits. It is neither a trading bloc nor an investment treaty.
If we break down the outcomes of the initiative, we can find that large projects under the BRI have greatly boosted the economy and improved local people’s livelihoods in many countries all over the world.