Trade-Offs and Trade-Ups
The U.S. hopes that nativism can restore its industrial dominance, while China relies on hyper-globalization to avoid the mistakes in its history.
The U.S. hopes that nativism can restore its industrial dominance, while China relies on hyper-globalization to avoid the mistakes in its history.
Washington’s measures, driven by short-term political gains over sustained collaboration, threaten global trade stability and harm all stakeholders.
President Trump’s new tariffs seriously threaten the American economy and its citizens. It is not too late to reconsider and turn to wisdom and common sense.
The growing global momentum towards climate action can not be stopped by Washington. This momentum is particularly strong in Asia, and China is an indispensable nation in the green transformation.
DeepSeek’s stunning release of an AI model that can rival ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost and time shows the power of Chinese innovation and lifts up the Global South.
Over these years, China has neither been crushed by tariff threats nor crippled by chip restrictions. Instead, it has emerged stronger and more resilient, sustaining economic growth based on its vast economic size.
Good coordination between China and the U.S. could yield positive results in areas like trade, climate change and global security. The key question is whether President Trump can bring the statesmanship necessary to rise to the occasion.
While Trump’s stance raises serious concerns, he alone cannot dictate America’s future.
In a well-regulated, reasonable, and peaceful public discourse environment, ‘TikTok refugees’ and Chinese netizens can largely build constructive and positive relations.
China will continue to deepen its space collaboration with other countries, actively participate in the formulation and implementation of international regulations, and promote the sustainability of international space cooperation.
If everything is national security, then nothing is national security.