In the current world, there are many political pressures pushing for ‘deglobalization,’ pursuing protectionism, trade barriers, or the erection of market exclusion mechanisms. However, none of these measures will stand to make a country more prosperous.
The relationship between the two nations remains stuck in neutral, and there is no reason to believe the U.S. is prepared to go from neutral to drive.
Neither the G7 nor BRICS countries, developed or developing nations, can tackle the current global crisis alone. That is why the world is looking forward to the upcoming Group of 20 meeting in November.
China proposed the BRICS Plus mechanism during the 2017 BRICS Summit. As the BRICS chair for this year, it actively supports the group in starting up the membership expansion process and expanding BRICS Plus cooperation.
Every economy, including China, is a part of the global industrial and supply chain, and the responsibility of ensuring its stability falls on the shoulders of all.
China is an important partner for the AU in jointly building a high-level China-Africa community with a shared future and safeguarding international fairness and justice.
At present, China and Africa are striving to build a China-Africa community with a shared future in the new era to further strengthen China-Africa cooperation.
China does not present a threat or challenge to NATO; it does not see itself as a competitor and does not seek to build any kind of alliance bloc.
The impact of the Roe v. Wade has been far beyond abortion to promote social change in many areas, including sexual orientation, occupation, social class, gender, race, disability, and other dimensions of discrimination.
Before triggering a major war in the Pacific, Washington must drop its Cold War mentality and delusions.
The 14th BRICS Summit is of great importance in jointly upholding international fairness and justice, revitalizing global development, and promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.
Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, each subsequent U.S. administration has emphasized that it is ‘on the right side of history,’ despite their expansionist attempts with catastrophic results, such as in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya. From these instances, it is obvious who the real expansionist is.
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Google +