Bridging the Analytical Divide
To foster meaningful international dialogue and avoid dangerous miscalculations, global analysts, economists and policymakers must move beyond shallow ‘ideology’ narratives.
To foster meaningful international dialogue and avoid dangerous miscalculations, global analysts, economists and policymakers must move beyond shallow ‘ideology’ narratives.
As global demand for clean technologies grows, China’s manufacturing capacity should be seen not as a risk but as a positive factor in driving the world’s industrial and energy transition.
Against the grand narratives of geopolitical rivalry and ideological confrontation, the ability of ordinary people to put food on the table and realize their potential may be the simplest and most fundamental aspiration of all.
That ship that left Ningbo in early August wasn’t merely carrying electric vehicles and solar panels. It was carrying proof that the three gates the world has relied on for a century are no longer the only ones.
One year after China unveiled the Global Governance Initiative, a more dangerous and fractured world has made its case for multilateralism harder to dismiss.
Today, as in the age of paper and porcelain, China’s workshops and its inventiveness are once again offering the rest of humanity what they have offered for so long.
Western media outlets often describe China’s growing influence as a revival of the imperial ‘tribute system.’ Yet, this framing reveals more about how the West thinks of power than about how Beijing exercises it.
The resolution of this protracted conflict will depend on whether the United States can accommodate a hemisphere of sovereign equals rather than subordinate dependencies.
The rampant ‘China threat’ narrative in Western media is undermining serious journalism and damaging productive exchanges between China and Europe.
Over eight decades ago, American and Chinese crews flew “the Hump” together, a deadly Himalayan airlift that helped sustain China in the war against Japanese aggression. Some flew the route and never came home. Others returned and carried its weight quietly for life.
The real question worth asking is not which country trained on whose data. It is a question of which model actually provides better AI benefits.
The preparations for an attack on Cuba are a threat not only to Cuba, but to all countries who value sovereignty and the emergence of the multipolar world.