Flawed Narratives of China and Technology Harm American Audiences
The United States alone will not own the 21st century, and it might not own it at all.
The United States alone will not own the 21st century, and it might not own it at all.
That the ruckus at the U.S. Congress about Taiwan-related issues has triggered a race to the bottom is alarming. It testifies to the relentless degradation of the political environment and the U.S.’s growing anxiety about losing its hegemony.
Amidst the rising tensions of a potential new Cold War and the revival of McCarthyism today, Americans should pause to contemplate the real consequences of confrontations masked as competition for themselves and their communities.
The expansion of BRICS to eleven members will advance the process of building a community with a shared future for mankind.
The U.S Congress’ negative ‘decoupling’ efforts are being questioned by multiple parties.
The movement towards de-dollarization of global trade is still in its initial stage.
It is nonetheless clear that Canberra’s best interests lie in a mature, practical, and mutually beneficial relationship with China.
Washington calculated that it could restrain China’s technology advancement and thereby stay ahead of the China. However, it appears that this calculation was mistaken.
In fact, setting a debt ceiling is just a stopgap measure, or even a smokescreen, to show voters that the government has not been idle. But is it necessary to have an upper limit that can be constantly broken?
When assessing China’s role in promoting the development of Africa, the distinction between the continent’s state pre- and post-BRI is clear for everyone to see. Facts don’t lie.
It is thus practical for London to partner with Beijing on intersecting challenges, help dial up strategic trust, and utilize their collective economic heft for the benefit of relations.
Only through greater and consistent international cooperation and solidarity can notable progress of global human rights become possible.